Originally published in Zenith City Weekly, Duluth, by Jim Richardson and Allen Richardson
An Israeli cognitive psychologist named Benny Shanon got himself in the news recently for writing a controversial article in the philosophy journal Time and Mind, suggesting that Moses might have been tripping during the whole burning bush and 10 Commandments thing. Shanon argues that the Acacia tree, mentioned in the Bible, is a good source of the potent hallucinogen DMT, and was used in rituals at the time.
Intrigued, we turned to our trusted psychedelics expert and ethnobotantist, Dr. Dennis McKenna. Dennis McKenna is the surviving brother of the Terence and Dennis McKenna brother act, famed for co-authoring the book The Invisible Landscape. (Dennis may be also be remembered by some of you Duluthians for being the special guest speaker at the “Area 61” UFO Convention a couple years ago.) One thing we wanted to pick Dennis’ brain about was that Benny Shanon was quoted in the Sydney Morning Herald about his Moses theory, but he used the word “narcotics” synonymously with “psychedelics.” This is a pet peeve of ours, since the government has consistently conflated hard and soft drugs in its decades-long War on Drugs, resulting in much confusion and injustice. So we asked Dennis if this indicated Shanon might not be a serious researcher, and what was his evaluation of Shanon’s theory.
Turns out Dennis knows the guy, knows all about it, and has been saying the same thing for years: “I know Benny Shanon personally, he’s a good scholar and the author of The Antipodes of the Mind, which is his book about ayahuasca. He should know better than to use the term ‘narcotic’ in reference to psychedelics, but I think he is deferring to mainstream no-nothingism. But his idea, or speculation, is right on. Many Acacia species are good sources of DMT; some of the Australian species are the most potent sources of DMT on the planet (up to 2% in some cases), but the African species are no slouches either when it comes to that. The trick is, what was the admixture plant? Because if the mixture was taken orally, you need a beta-carboline-containing plant, as a source of MAO inhibitors, in order to render it orally active. Fortunately, there’s already a good candidate: Peganum harmala, the Syrian rue …. It was already recognized as a sacred plant in the Middle East at the time of Moses, and some have speculated that it is one candidate for the legendary Soma; Peganum harmala is called “haoma” in Persian, and it probably was used, likely in combo with Acacia or some DMT-bearing plant. So, yeah, I think Benny is correct in his speculation (I’ve been making the same, in lectures and such, for years…). He will of course be denounced, but that’s about what you’d expect. The theocratic fascists don’t like it when you assert that their major prophets were just stoners! All the more reason to figure he’s probably right. BTW, the Acacias were also important to the Egyptians. They had a major jones on about it, probably because they also knew about its entheogenic qualities.”
The word “entheogenic” refers to that class of psychedelics which bring forth “god from within,” a specialty of DMT. So it does appear that Moses could have been tripping. As Shanon was quoted saying in the Sydney Morning Herald, “As far Moses on Mount Sinai is concerned, it was either a supernatural cosmic event, which I don’t believe, or a legend, which I don’t believe either…” The alternative is that Moses was tripping, which Shanon rightly characterizes as “very probable.”
Very probable… if Moses actually existed. There are a number of views on this, but suffice it to say that there is apparently no archeological evidence of the Exodus, and that Moses may very well have been a character cobbled together from various sources as the Bible developed during its long and complex history. There may in fact be a so-called “historical core” beneath centuries of calcified embellishments and transmission errors. Pioneering Biblical scholar Martin Noth believed Moses may have actually been “an obscure person from Moab” that an early Biblical editor decided to “(weave) separate themes and traditions around.” So if Moses existed, he may have been tripping, or he may have been an obscure person from Moab, subsequently elevated by an editor into a fantastic mythology.