In honor of the anniversary of the JFK assassination, which I have missed by one day, I offer these links to JFK assassination researcher Jim Fetzer. Here is what you might call his homepage and this is a link to an excellent, important article he wrote called “Reasoning About Assassinations.”
I consider Jim Fetzer a friend since interviewing him about the JFK assassination for the Gonzo Science book - coincidentally the very same day that Paul Wellstone died - a somber and surreal bonding experience. I witnessed Fetzer correctly predicting there would be no black box on the plane. That counts: he made a testable prediction that bore fruit. Fetzer also helped us flesh out the first couple of “AREA 61″ UFO Conventions we did by agreeing to provide juicy conspiracy lectures that really added to the “X-Files” flavor we were looking for. Thank you Jim for all that you did for us - a true Gonzo Scientist.
Say what you will about Jim Fetzer. I certainly don’t believe everything he has to say. For instance we here at Gonzo Science are squishy about 9/11 conspiracy in general and various others. However, I think Fetzer is by and large spot-on about the JFK assassination, although I lack the technical knowledge to fairly evaluate all of what some of his experts are saying.
The thing that makes him matter though, and the reason why we interviewed him for the Gonzo Science book, is that he uses all the tools in the skeptics’ critical-thinking toolbox - his PhD is in History and Philosophy of Science for Chrissake. And yet he comes to conclusions at variance with skeptics who champion the same toolbox. Jim Fetzer is a highly-skilled critical thinker who concludes that JFK was victim of a conspiracy. He has marshalled scientific experts to argue the case. Yes he is controversial. But more than anyone else in the JFK field, his work shows that the conspiracy crowd can lay claim to some genuine scientific support and scientific reasoning - i.e. the conspiracy crowd is not just a bunch of idiots.
The relevance to the Gonzo Science project in general is that Jim Fetzer’s JFK work specifically mirrors the case for many theories outside the scientific mainstream. Fetzer is one of many scientific thinkers who uses the tools of science to come to the opposite conclusion of many scientists. We see it over and over: Halton Arp vs. Big Astronomy, Brian Goodwin vs. Richard Dawkins in biology, the EPA vs. itself… This is one of our central concerns here: how to resolve the truth in a science vs science situation. The gonzo answer is to do your own research.