Science writing at its most stenographic. Link. The gist: black holes not performing as expected, undermining the Big Bang premise. Solution: Move the goal post and sell the writer a bill of goods. When will science writers stop being mere mouthpieces for the orthodoxy?
I’m with Halton Arp - they’re white holes, not black holes. Keep that in mind as you read about how puzzling the mainsteam’s results are - “an interesting non-discovery”. Sheesh. Hey astronomer boy, how about, “Yet more evidence that the Big Bang theory is wrong”?
